Difference between revisions of "Manicheanism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (undeadend)
(Links, some reworking)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Manicheanism''' (Manichaeism), a belief system that teaches that there exists two separate, opposite and equally ultimate Principles: the Light and the Darkness. This concept is known as dualism, and it is the [[heart]] and soul of Manicheanism.  
+
'''Manicheanism''' (Manichaeism), a belief system that teaches that there exists two separate, opposite and equally ultimate Principles: the Light and the Darkness. This concept is known as [[dualism]], and it is the [[heart]] and soul of Manicheanism.  
  
−
Several origins of Manicheanism have been noted.
+
Several origins of Manicheanism have been noted:
  
−
One is that this dualistic religion was founded by Mani, a Persian sage, in the third century after Christ. Mani synthesised Christian, Buddhist and Zoroastrian elements into his religion. He taught that there were two gods, one good, one evil.  
+
* One is that this dualistic [[religion]] was founded by [[Mani]], a Persian sage, in the third century after [[Christ]]. Mani synthesised [[Christian]], [[Buddhist]] and [[Zoroastrian]] elements into his religion. He taught that there were two gods, one good, one evil.  
  
−
The second is that the founder of Manicheanism was Manicheus, who lived in Mesopotamia. Manicheanism assimilated much of the Christian message, re-interpreting it to fit the Gnostic belief system.
+
* The second is that the founder of Manicheanism was [[Manicheus]], who lived in [[Mesopotamia]]. Manicheanism assimilated much of the Christian message, re-interpreting it to fit the [[Gnostic]] belief system.
  
−
Manicheanism was once a major world religion, but even though it has completely vanished, it continues to have an effect on western Christian theology.
+
Manicheanism was once a major world religion, but has since completely vanished over time.
  
−
St. Augustine of Hippo was a Manichee before he converted to Christianity. He became disillusioned with Manicheanism for several reasons.
+
[[St. Augustine]] of Hippo was a Manichee before he converted to Christianity. He became disillusioned with Manicheanism for several reasons.
  
 
A revival has been attempted under the name of Neo-Manicheanism.  
 
A revival has been attempted under the name of Neo-Manicheanism.  
 +
 +
==Sources==
  
 
Reference: Charles E. Curran, “Natural Law and Contemporary Moral Theology,” in Contraception: Authority and Dissent, ed. Charles E. Curran (New York: Herder & Herder, 1969), pp. 151-175.
 
Reference: Charles E. Curran, “Natural Law and Contemporary Moral Theology,” in Contraception: Authority and Dissent, ed. Charles E. Curran (New York: Herder & Herder, 1969), pp. 151-175.
  
 
[[category:religion]]
 
[[category:religion]]

Revision as of 16:38, December 27, 2007

Manicheanism (Manichaeism), a belief system that teaches that there exists two separate, opposite and equally ultimate Principles: the Light and the Darkness. This concept is known as dualism, and it is the heart and soul of Manicheanism.

Several origins of Manicheanism have been noted:

  • One is that this dualistic religion was founded by Mani, a Persian sage, in the third century after Christ. Mani synthesised Christian, Buddhist and Zoroastrian elements into his religion. He taught that there were two gods, one good, one evil.
  • The second is that the founder of Manicheanism was Manicheus, who lived in Mesopotamia. Manicheanism assimilated much of the Christian message, re-interpreting it to fit the Gnostic belief system.

Manicheanism was once a major world religion, but has since completely vanished over time.

St. Augustine of Hippo was a Manichee before he converted to Christianity. He became disillusioned with Manicheanism for several reasons.

A revival has been attempted under the name of Neo-Manicheanism.

Sources

Reference: Charles E. Curran, “Natural Law and Contemporary Moral Theology,” in Contraception: Authority and Dissent, ed. Charles E. Curran (New York: Herder & Herder, 1969), pp. 151-175.