Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 22:56, December 29, 2007

559 bytes removed , 22:56, December 29, 2007

Line 584: Line 584:

== Zeta - if we want to go there? ==

−

I don't know if anyone wants to go quite so deep into the cesspit that is Wikipedia, but I'll ask anyway. ~~The article on~~ [~~http~~:~~//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia Zoophilia] i.e. bestiality, has to be the most biased in the whole place, in a way that is disgusting. It portrays a very romantic version~~ of ~~bestiality as a lifestyle. It is unsourced in many places, e.g. the section on~~ [~~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia#Zoophilia_as_a_lifestyle Zoophilia as a lifestyle~~], and even when it is sourced, it selectively cites research that portrays the activity in a positive light. It is closely guarded by a group of ZETA activists (Zoophiles for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and any attempt to balance the article is met by summary blocking or banning. Three editors have already met this fate. (I am the last).

+

I don't know if anyone wants to go quite so deep into the cesspit that is Wikipedia, but I'll ask anyway. [Ed. Note: remainder deleted based on application of our [[rules]]]

−

~~I have tried getting other conservative-minded people~~ to ~~help, but the whole thing is too revolting for them~~ to ~~tackle~~. ~~How about it~~, ~~Conservapedians? I could point out~~ the ~~areas of bias~~, ~~and lack of neutrality, if~~ it ~~is not obvious~~. ~~''Pax et bonum''~~ [[User:~~WilliamofOcham~~|~~WilliamofOcham~~]] 16:08, 29 December 2007 (EST)

+

: You're right that it is a cesspit, and our adherence to higher standards than [[Wikipedia]] requires us to refrain from wading into every cesspit. For now, we'll pass on trying to clean up the cesspit you've identified, though I do not fault you for identifying it as such. I look forward to reviewing your substantive contributions here. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:56, 29 December 2007 (EST)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,530

edits