Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fact"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Poisonicepenwedge (Talk); changed back to last version by Elamdri) |
(I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Good Idea! Done.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | Good Idea! Done.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could a sysop ''please'' close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example [[Template:Examples of Liberal Bias]] where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | ===Example=== | ||
| + | {{fact}} | ||
Revision as of 18:58, December 30, 2007
Given the frequency of this template's use, the unlikelihood that it will change in the future, and how often it has been a target of vandalism... it would probably be a good idea to protect this. --Mtur 18:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Good Idea! Done.--Elamdri 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)
Could a sysop please close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example Template:Examples of Liberal Bias where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --JakeC 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)