Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fact"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Thanks, Ed!) |
m (→I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT): "nowiki" for the fact template itself to remove it from the "Articles with unsourced statements" category) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST) | :Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST) | ||
===Example=== | ===Example=== | ||
| − | {{fact}} | + | <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> (Not needed since it's fixed now) |
Revision as of 19:03, December 30, 2007
Given the frequency of this template's use, the unlikelihood that it will change in the future, and how often it has been a target of vandalism... it would probably be a good idea to protect this. --Mtur 18:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Good Idea! Done.--Elamdri 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)
Could a sysop please close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example Template:Examples of Liberal Bias where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --JakeC 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --JakeC 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)
Example
{{fact}} (Not needed since it's fixed now)