Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fact"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT): "nowiki" for the fact template itself to remove it from the "Articles with unsourced statements" category)
(→‎I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT): end of the year is an excellent time to brag)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Could a sysop ''please'' close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example [[Template:Examples of Liberal Bias]] where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 
Could a sysop ''please'' close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example [[Template:Examples of Liberal Bias]] where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 
:Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 
:Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)
−
===Example===
+
 
−
<nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> (Not needed since it's fixed now)
+
::patrolling, using software I myself designed ... --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:05, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 19:05, December 30, 2007

Given the frequency of this template's use, the unlikelihood that it will change in the future, and how often it has been a target of vandalism... it would probably be a good idea to protect this. --Mtur 18:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Good Idea! Done.--Elamdri 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)

Could a sysop please close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example Template:Examples of Liberal Bias where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --JakeC 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --JakeC 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)
patrolling, using software I myself designed ... --Ed Poor Talk 14:05, 30 December 2007 (EST)