Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fact"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT): end of the year is an excellent time to brag) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::patrolling, using software I myself designed ... --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:05, 30 December 2007 (EST) | ::patrolling, using software I myself designed ... --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:05, 30 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Now I have to imagine some sort of Red Alert claxon rigged to your computer which goes off whenever the Recent Changes contain the words "urgent" or "sysop"... --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 14:08, 30 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:08, December 30, 2007
Given the frequency of this template's use, the unlikelihood that it will change in the future, and how often it has been a target of vandalism... it would probably be a good idea to protect this. --Mtur 18:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Good Idea! Done.--Elamdri 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)
Could a sysop please close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example Template:Examples of Liberal Bias where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --JakeC 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- Update: Fixed. Thanks, Ed! Were you patrolling the recent changes or did you just notice this issue around the same time I did? --JakeC 14:02, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- Now I have to imagine some sort of Red Alert claxon rigged to your computer which goes off whenever the Recent Changes contain the words "urgent" or "sysop"... --JakeC 14:08, 30 December 2007 (EST)