Difference between revisions of "Science and philosophy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (categorize)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:"Our culture is one that deeply praises [[science]], so we assume because someone is a good scientist, they must be a good [[philosopher]]." ([http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/14/nfaith114.xml lecture at Swansea University])
 
:"Our culture is one that deeply praises [[science]], so we assume because someone is a good scientist, they must be a good [[philosopher]]." ([http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/14/nfaith114.xml lecture at Swansea University])
  
−
*He rejected Prof [[Dawkins]]'s theory which assumes [[culture]] is transmitted in a similar way to [[biology]], through "[[meme]]s" as opposed to [[gene]]s, and added: "I find this philosophically crass and undeveloped at best, simply [[contradictory]] and empty at worst."
+
*He rejected Prof [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]]'s theory which assumes [[culture]] is transmitted in a similar way to [[biology]], through "[[meme]]s" as opposed to [[gene]]s, and added: "I find this philosophically crass and undeveloped at best, simply [[contradictory]] and empty at worst."
  
 
*Dr Williams added that to see religion as a survival strategy was to misunderstand it.
 
*Dr Williams added that to see religion as a survival strategy was to misunderstand it.

Revision as of 17:16, December 31, 2007

Rowan Williams said:

"Our culture is one that deeply praises science, so we assume because someone is a good scientist, they must be a good philosopher." (lecture at Swansea University)
  • He rejected Prof Dawkins's theory which assumes culture is transmitted in a similar way to biology, through "memes" as opposed to genes, and added: "I find this philosophically crass and undeveloped at best, simply contradictory and empty at worst."
  • Dr Williams added that to see religion as a survival strategy was to misunderstand it.