Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ogg Vorbis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MakeTomorrow (talk | contribs) |
MakeTomorrow (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Seeing as an article for [[MP3]] currently exists, I see no reason why this should not be allowed to stand. Admittedly, it could, perhaps, use some NPOVing, but still… --[[User:AngryCommunist|<font color="#ff0000">Angry</font><font color="#000000">Communist</font>]] 18:54, 1 January 2008 (EST) | Seeing as an article for [[MP3]] currently exists, I see no reason why this should not be allowed to stand. Admittedly, it could, perhaps, use some NPOVing, but still… --[[User:AngryCommunist|<font color="#ff0000">Angry</font><font color="#000000">Communist</font>]] 18:54, 1 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Seeing as an article for MP3 currently exists, I see no reason why this should not be allowed to stand. Admittedly, it could, perhaps, use some NPOVing, but still… and the codec article is, if I may say so, pretty bad. --[[User:AngryCommunist|<font color="#ff0000">Angry</font><font color="#000000">Communist</font>]] 18:55, 1 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 23:55, January 1, 2008
Yes, please merge:
- It has a tendency to read right now as a stand alone advertisement. Learn together 18:23, 1 January 2008 (EST)
Seeing as an article for MP3 currently exists, I see no reason why this should not be allowed to stand. Admittedly, it could, perhaps, use some NPOVing, but still… --AngryCommunist 18:54, 1 January 2008 (EST)
- Seeing as an article for MP3 currently exists, I see no reason why this should not be allowed to stand. Admittedly, it could, perhaps, use some NPOVing, but still… and the codec article is, if I may say so, pretty bad. --AngryCommunist 18:55, 1 January 2008 (EST)