Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Featured articles"
m |
(Order) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Is Bible good? I new at this so I'll have to learn a little! :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 17:07, 22 December 2007 (EST) | Is Bible good? I new at this so I'll have to learn a little! :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 17:07, 22 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | == Order == | ||
| + | Could we have some indication of what order the articles will be made feature articles? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I assumed that Genesis would be the next one, as it was next on the list, so made some improvements to it (well, ''I'' thought they were improvements!). I didn't go beyond that. Of course, being an Aussie with little knowledge or nor interest in American politics, I wouldn't have done anything to the Republican Party article, so I don't feel cheated in that sense, but some advance notice on what will be next would be a good idea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:29, 4 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:29, January 4, 2008
My friend are these articles that we wish to see improved or articles that we wish to have displayed as examples of articles that capture the spirit of Conservapedia? Thank you. Learn together 12:55, 14 December 2007 (EST)
- This is the list of articles that are proposed for the Main page's section "Featured articles". Please add as many as you wish. You can also object one or more of them or improve any as I did with I Have a Dream. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 17:28, 14 December 2007 (EST)
- Articles should show the spirit of Conservapedia but also represent the best we have and be attractive for users of CP. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 09:40, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Is Bible good? I new at this so I'll have to learn a little! :P ~BCSTalk2ME 17:07, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Order
Could we have some indication of what order the articles will be made feature articles?
I assumed that Genesis would be the next one, as it was next on the list, so made some improvements to it (well, I thought they were improvements!). I didn't go beyond that. Of course, being an Aussie with little knowledge or nor interest in American politics, I wouldn't have done anything to the Republican Party article, so I don't feel cheated in that sense, but some advance notice on what will be next would be a good idea.
Philip J. Rayment 02:29, 4 January 2008 (EST)