Difference between revisions of "Homosexual act"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(removed liberal bias that had been added)
Line 1: Line 1:
The term '''homosexual act''' can be applied to any romantic or erotic interaction between persons of the same sex. Attitudes towards such acts vary from culture to culture, and from individual to individual. Although some claim that such acts are forbidden by religious texts such as the [[Bible]] and the [[Qur'an]], references to and records of sexual relations between persons of the same sex exist for almost every human civilisation throughout history.
+
The term '''homosexual act''' can be applied to any romantic or erotic interaction between persons of the same sex.  
 +
 
 +
Attitudes towards such acts vary, subjectively, from culture to culture, and from individual to individual. Liberals claim that references to and records of sexual relations between persons of the same sex exist for almost every human civilization throughout history somehow make the act acceptable.
 +
 
 +
However, such acts are forbidden by religious texts such as the [[Bible]] and the [[Qur'an]].  A subjective cultural ''imprimatur'' of acceptability does not save the objective immorality of the act.
  
 
[[Category:Homosexuality]]
 
[[Category:Homosexuality]]

Revision as of 22:32, January 8, 2008

The term homosexual act can be applied to any romantic or erotic interaction between persons of the same sex.

Attitudes towards such acts vary, subjectively, from culture to culture, and from individual to individual. Liberals claim that references to and records of sexual relations between persons of the same sex exist for almost every human civilization throughout history somehow make the act acceptable.

However, such acts are forbidden by religious texts such as the Bible and the Qur'an. A subjective cultural imprimatur of acceptability does not save the objective immorality of the act.