Difference between revisions of "Talk:Republican in name only"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Ron Paul)
(re)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
== Ron Paul ==
 
== Ron Paul ==
  
−
I added Ron Paul because he seems like more of a Libertarian than a Republican. His ideas are far too 'out there' versus a traditional Republican.
+
I added Ron Paul because he seems like more of a Libertarian than a Republican. His ideas are far too 'out there' versus a traditional Republican.{{unsigned|LibertyorDeath}}
 +
:I reverted you simply because I can see a lot of people disagreeing with you - so try waiting for a reaction before you post again--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:33, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 23:33, January 10, 2008

The "Accused" RINOs section in the article

I think the section entitled "accused RINOs" should have references and/or should be eliminated lest it become a platform for internet users to vent. PheasantHunter 00:28, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

Lincoln Chafee

His article actually lists him as a liberal, so would we consider him a centrist here? DanH 17:20, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Yes, based upon party affiliation. A centrist is by definition someone can can work with either liberals or conservatives, and he does exactly that. RobS 17:25, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Ron Paul

I added Ron Paul because he seems like more of a Libertarian than a Republican. His ideas are far too 'out there' versus a traditional Republican.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by LibertyorDeath (talk)

I reverted you simply because I can see a lot of people disagreeing with you - so try waiting for a reaction before you post again--IDuan 18:33, 10 January 2008 (EST)