Difference between revisions of "Interstate commerce"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Railroads discriminated in the prices they charged to passengers and shippers in different localities by providing rebates to large shippers or buyers.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{stub}} | |
==Quotes== | ==Quotes== | ||
*The railroad monopolies had the power to set prices, exclude competitors, and control the market in several geographic areas. Although there was competition among railroads for long-haul routes, there was none for short-haul runs. Railroads discriminated in the prices they charged to passengers and shippers in different localities by providing rebates to large shippers or buyers. These practices were especially harmful to American farmers, who lacked the shipment volume necessary to obtain more favorable rates. [http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=49] | *The railroad monopolies had the power to set prices, exclude competitors, and control the market in several geographic areas. Although there was competition among railroads for long-haul routes, there was none for short-haul runs. Railroads discriminated in the prices they charged to passengers and shippers in different localities by providing rebates to large shippers or buyers. These practices were especially harmful to American farmers, who lacked the shipment volume necessary to obtain more favorable rates. [http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=49] | ||
Revision as of 01:42, January 14, 2008
Quotes
- The railroad monopolies had the power to set prices, exclude competitors, and control the market in several geographic areas. Although there was competition among railroads for long-haul routes, there was none for short-haul runs. Railroads discriminated in the prices they charged to passengers and shippers in different localities by providing rebates to large shippers or buyers. These practices were especially harmful to American farmers, who lacked the shipment volume necessary to obtain more favorable rates. [1]