Difference between revisions of "Luke"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Improve, expand, provide quotes) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Luke''' was a [[Greek]] doctor who wrote the [[Gospel of Luke]] and the [[Acts (of the Apostles)|Acts of the Apostles]]. | + | '''Luke''' was a [[Greek]] doctor who wrote the [[Gospel of Luke]] and the [[Acts (of the Apostles)|Acts of the Apostles]]. |
| + | Unlike [[Matthew the Apostle|Matthew]] and [[John the Apostle|John]], Luke did not observe the events of [[Jesus]]'s life first hand, but relied upon eyewitness accounts. | ||
| + | And unlike Matthew who wrote for a Jewish audience, Luke wrote for a [[Gentile]] audience. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since Luke was a highly educated man, his gospel is very detailed and comprehensive. | ||
| + | Archaeologist [[William Ramsay]] said of Luke: | ||
| + | {{QuoteBox|Luke's history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness ...<ref>Sir William Ramsay, ''The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament'' (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1953), p. 222. ISBN 978-0801076770 (quoted at [http://www.xenos.org/teachings/topical/objections/accurate.htm])</ref>}} | ||
| + | and | ||
| + | {{QuoteBox|Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy ... this author should be placed along with the very greatest historians.<ref>Sir William Ramsay, ''St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen'' (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1962), p. 81. (quoted at [http://www.xenos.org/teachings/topical/objections/accurate.htm])</ref>}} | ||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | {{reflist|2}} | |
[[Category:Saints]] | [[Category:Saints]] | ||
[[Category:Biblical persons]] | [[Category:Biblical persons]] | ||
Revision as of 07:13, January 16, 2008
Luke was a Greek doctor who wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles. Unlike Matthew and John, Luke did not observe the events of Jesus's life first hand, but relied upon eyewitness accounts. And unlike Matthew who wrote for a Jewish audience, Luke wrote for a Gentile audience.
Since Luke was a highly educated man, his gospel is very detailed and comprehensive. Archaeologist William Ramsay said of Luke:
Luke's history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness ...[1]
and
Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy ... this author should be placed along with the very greatest historians.[2]