Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 22:11, January 16, 2008

333 bytes added , 22:11, January 16, 2008

→‎A simple solution to grievances: no, you miss the point

Line 563: Line 563:

I gotta say, if you think that wikipedia is missing an important point on a topic, edit the page to include it. Is that not kind of the point? --[[User:Falcifer|Falcifer]] 17:02, 16 January 2008 (EST)

+

: No, my friend, you're missing the point. Wikipedia ''enforces'' its bias. Edits that remove [[liberal]] bias there are reverted. It is a waste of time to try to remove [[liberal]] bias. It's like trying to keep the Titanic afloat by using buckets to expel the water.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:11, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,506

edits