Difference between revisions of "Judges talk:Contest"
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Iduan is also counting tiny edits to a page as two points. --[[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 09:29, 17 January 2008 (EST) | Iduan is also counting tiny edits to a page as two points. --[[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 09:29, 17 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would agree, Feebasfactor could gain some points from the template he made but they should not be added to his score for the edit to the page he applied the template towards. I also do not believe that a point should be given to a redirect based on the plurization of a term.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 14:54, 17 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:54, January 17, 2008
Feebasfactor
I've been watching his edits and do not think that making pages like this, or this, or [[Carboxylic acid|this] are worth the 6 points they are counted as. What's your opinion? Also making a miniature edit like changing a word or letter should count for two whole points. What say you? Thanks, --~BCSTalk2ME 09:22, 17 January 2008 (EST)
Iduan is also counting tiny edits to a page as two points. --~BCSTalk2ME 09:29, 17 January 2008 (EST)
I would agree, Feebasfactor could gain some points from the template he made but they should not be added to his score for the edit to the page he applied the template towards. I also do not believe that a point should be given to a redirect based on the plurization of a term.--Able806 14:54, 17 January 2008 (EST)