1,193
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:24, January 18, 2008
, 03:24, January 18, 2008no edit summary
You mean that a person adding a section describing Bhutto's work on abortion and citing, for example, a page from a reputable autobiography of her, will find that this addition will be removed? I'm sorry if I sound incredulus.--[[User:Falcifer|Falcifer]] 17:25, 16 January 2008 (EST)
You mean that a person adding a section describing Bhutto's work on abortion and citing, for example, a page from a reputable autobiography of her, will find that this addition will be removed? I'm sorry if I sound incredulus.--[[User:Falcifer|Falcifer]] 17:25, 16 January 2008 (EST)
== The main premise of Wikipedia.==
If you think it's wrong, you can attempt to fix it. If the page is locked, discuss on the talk page. I honstly fail to understand how this is all lost on every last one of you... [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:24, 17 January 2008 (EST)