Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Conservatism Essential to Religion"
From Conservapedia
MakeTomorrow (Talk | contribs) (New page: This is the most abject example of ludicrous rubbish I have ever had the great misfortune to encounter. --~~~~) |
Liam Spencer (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is the most abject example of ludicrous rubbish I have ever had the great misfortune to encounter. --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 20:37, 20 January 2008 (EST) | This is the most abject example of ludicrous rubbish I have ever had the great misfortune to encounter. --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 20:37, 20 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Hope you can do better than that! I'm not optimistic. :-( --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:38, 20 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | # "conservatism reacts quickly to ever-changing liberal assaults on values". | ||
| + | #:I don't see how that's relevant to conservatism being essential to religion. | ||
| + | # "conservatism explains how government affects people's beliefs and conduct" | ||
| + | #:And nothing else does? | ||
| + | # "modern media did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to combat media" | ||
| + | #:Okay… that's not tangent at all, is it? | ||
| + | # "church is once-a-week or less for most people, while conservatism is 24x7" | ||
| + | #:And that's totally essential to religion. Yep. Entirely. That's absurd, Andy. Now you're insinuating that conservatism substitutes for religion? | ||
| + | # "public schools did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to educate students" | ||
| + | #:Since when is the latter true? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 20:43, 20 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I agree with some of those things, but surely it'd be easy to improve... just fix up some sentences a bit. --<font face=Courier>[[User:LiamS|<font color=#6495ED>'''L'''iam</font> <font color=#CC5500>'''S'''pencer</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:LiamS|<font color=steelblue>(talk)</font>]]</sup></font> 20:45, 20 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:45, January 21, 2008
This is the most abject example of ludicrous rubbish I have ever had the great misfortune to encounter. --MakeTomorrow 20:37, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Hope you can do better than that! I'm not optimistic. :-( --Aschlafly 20:38, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- "conservatism reacts quickly to ever-changing liberal assaults on values".
- I don't see how that's relevant to conservatism being essential to religion.
- "conservatism explains how government affects people's beliefs and conduct"
- And nothing else does?
- "modern media did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to combat media"
- Okay… that's not tangent at all, is it?
- "church is once-a-week or less for most people, while conservatism is 24x7"
- And that's totally essential to religion. Yep. Entirely. That's absurd, Andy. Now you're insinuating that conservatism substitutes for religion?
- "public schools did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to educate students"
- Since when is the latter true?
--MakeTomorrow 20:43, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- I agree with some of those things, but surely it'd be easy to improve... just fix up some sentences a bit. --Liam Spencer (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2008 (EST)
