Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal supremacist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Having never met a "Liberal Supremacist", I doubt the first one and know the second isn't true. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:01, 23 January 2008 (EST) | :Having never met a "Liberal Supremacist", I doubt the first one and know the second isn't true. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:01, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. | + | As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. I'll gladly change my view if i see one piece of proof. |
Revision as of 18:40, January 23, 2008
I made a minor Spelling/Grammar change to the article, but I wanted to clarify one somewhat ambiguous point - do liberal supremacists believe that possessing a liberal ideology renders them intellectually superior, or is the belief that they are intellectually superior a side-effect of the liberal ideology? Feebasfactor 11:58, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Having never met a "Liberal Supremacist", I doubt the first one and know the second isn't true. Barikada 13:01, 23 January 2008 (EST)
As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. I'll gladly change my view if i see one piece of proof.