Difference between revisions of "Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I think I may have misinterpreted that statement, but... Sir, are you accusing me of making nothing but snarky, hypocritcal edits? For that matter, how is it hypocritical? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ::I think I may have misinterpreted that statement, but... Sir, are you accusing me of making nothing but snarky, hypocritcal edits? For that matter, how is it hypocritical? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:::That edit was snarky and hypocritical, yes. It is snarky because it was made simply to be obnoxious and hypocritical because you questioned unsourced material in the [[Video game]] article. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST) | :::That edit was snarky and hypocritical, yes. It is snarky because it was made simply to be obnoxious and hypocritical because you questioned unsourced material in the [[Video game]] article. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::::Ah. Gotcha. Sorry for misinterpreting what you said, then. I shall read more carefully next time. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:49, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:There is a large and well referenced section on controversy and criticism. All you added was unreferenced parody. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:43, 23 January 2008 (EST) | :There is a large and well referenced section on controversy and criticism. All you added was unreferenced parody. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:43, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::All of which focuses on claims made before the game came out. It wasn't parody. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ::All of which focuses on claims made before the game came out. It wasn't parody. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:::Wait, what am I talking about? The last sentence was. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | :::Wait, what am I talking about? The last sentence was. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:49, January 23, 2008
Uhhh... criticism of issues within the game isn't allowed? Barikada 13:32, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Sure it is, but snarky, unsourced (love the hypocrisy of that) edits like yours aren't. Jinxmchue 13:42, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- I think I may have misinterpreted that statement, but... Sir, are you accusing me of making nothing but snarky, hypocritcal edits? For that matter, how is it hypocritical? Barikada 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- That edit was snarky and hypocritical, yes. It is snarky because it was made simply to be obnoxious and hypocritical because you questioned unsourced material in the Video game article. Jinxmchue 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Ah. Gotcha. Sorry for misinterpreting what you said, then. I shall read more carefully next time. Barikada 13:49, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- That edit was snarky and hypocritical, yes. It is snarky because it was made simply to be obnoxious and hypocritical because you questioned unsourced material in the Video game article. Jinxmchue 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- I think I may have misinterpreted that statement, but... Sir, are you accusing me of making nothing but snarky, hypocritcal edits? For that matter, how is it hypocritical? Barikada 13:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- There is a large and well referenced section on controversy and criticism. All you added was unreferenced parody. Learn together 13:43, 23 January 2008 (EST)