Difference between revisions of "Debate:Are there any conservatives left in the Republican Party?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(suggesting Jeff Flake) |
(That's a great liberal parody.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*I think a good litmus test for a conservative is whether or not they subscribe to [[Global Warming|global warming]] theories. Global warming is a liberal scheme to have government involvement in everything. Control energy usage, enslave the masses. Now that [[Fred Thompson]] has bowed out, I don't think we have any viable conservative candidates left in the Republican party. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 23:28, 23 January 2008 (EST) | *I think a good litmus test for a conservative is whether or not they subscribe to [[Global Warming|global warming]] theories. Global warming is a liberal scheme to have government involvement in everything. Control energy usage, enslave the masses. Now that [[Fred Thompson]] has bowed out, I don't think we have any viable conservative candidates left in the Republican party. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 23:28, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :::LOL. "Science behind global warming." Hehehehehe. That's a great liberal parody. You're funny. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 01:35, 24 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 06:35, January 24, 2008
Are there any conservatives left in the republican party?
- I think a good litmus test for a conservative is whether or not they subscribe to global warming theories. Global warming is a liberal scheme to have government involvement in everything. Control energy usage, enslave the masses. Now that Fred Thompson has bowed out, I don't think we have any viable conservative candidates left in the Republican party. SW♠·♥·♣ 23:28, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). DanH 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)