Difference between revisions of "Talk:Genius bias"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MakeTomorrow (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 380227 by Special:Contributions/Iduan (User talk:Iduan), rv unnecessary censorious rv) |
(rv - i) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: "More qualified" is a clear term. Do you have access to a dictionary? A scientist with 2 PhD's like [[Richard Sternberg]] is "more qualified" than one without any PhD's, like most evolution promoters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:25, 6 January 2008 (EST) | : "More qualified" is a clear term. Do you have access to a dictionary? A scientist with 2 PhD's like [[Richard Sternberg]] is "more qualified" than one without any PhD's, like most evolution promoters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:25, 6 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | |||
== New bias? == | == New bias? == | ||
Revision as of 22:07, January 25, 2008
I'm confused by "more qualified." What exactly does this mean? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Americanscientist (talk)
- "More qualified" is a clear term. Do you have access to a dictionary? A scientist with 2 PhD's like Richard Sternberg is "more qualified" than one without any PhD's, like most evolution promoters.--Aschlafly 11:25, 6 January 2008 (EST)
New bias?
Mr. Schlafly, Is this a term that you coined? Never heard of it before and google search does not come out with any thing significant. Can we also please coin new terms and introduce them via the encyclopedia? --JBuscombe 12:49, 6 January 2008 (EST)
- See Conservapedia terms --Crocoite 16:26, 6 January 2008 (EST)