Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Copying"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*Part of [[Soccer]], from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soccer | *Part of [[Soccer]], from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soccer | ||
*[[Punk music]], from Wikipedia "Christian punk", GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_punk | *[[Punk music]], from Wikipedia "Christian punk", GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_punk | ||
| − | *[[Tarot]], most of Conservapedia text | + | *[[Tarot]], most of Conservapedia text copied from a portion of the Wikipedia article "Tarocchi," GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarocchi |
| + | *[[Shark]], most of Conservapedia text copied from a portion of the Wikipedia article "Shark," GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark | ||
==Copied from a source that is probably public domain== | ==Copied from a source that is probably public domain== | ||
*USS Nautilus, from http://www.cnrc.navy.mil/nucfield/Background/history.htm | *USS Nautilus, from http://www.cnrc.navy.mil/nucfield/Background/history.htm | ||
Revision as of 15:35, March 15, 2007
Use this page to note of articles that appear to have been copied from other sources, or that appear to have made use of large amounts (more than a paragraph) from other sources.
Because Conservapedia's policies on copying are not yet clear, and are not obvious to users, most of these entries will have been made in good faith by users who are trying to help Conservapedia.
If you can tell, put the material under the proper heading.
I don't think there's any rush to do anything in particular about these until it's clear what the policy is. Dpbsmith 14:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Do not know which heading to put it under
- Siberian tiger, copied from more than one source, including:
- PBS (no explicit copyright notice), http://www.pbs.org/kratts/world/eurasia/tiger/index.html
- Wikipedia, GFDL, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amur_Tiger
Copied from a website that posts an explicit copyright notice
Copied from a website that does not have any conspicuous copyright or licensing notice
Copied from a website that uses a "free license" like GFDL or Creative Commons
- Harold Glasser, from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Glasser
- Perlo group, from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perlo_group
- Soccer, from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_(soccer)
- Switzerland, from Wikipedia, GFDL licence, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland
- Aborto, from the Spanish Wikipedia, GFDL licence, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aborto_inducido
- Evaporation, from Wikipedia, GFDL licence, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation
- Hadrian's wall, from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian's_wall
- Part of Soccer, from Wikipedia, GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soccer
- Punk music, from Wikipedia "Christian punk", GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_punk
- Tarot, most of Conservapedia text copied from a portion of the Wikipedia article "Tarocchi," GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarocchi
- Shark, most of Conservapedia text copied from a portion of the Wikipedia article "Shark," GFDL license, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark
Copied from a source that is probably public domain
- USS Nautilus, from http://www.cnrc.navy.mil/nucfield/Background/history.htm