Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lexda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(final response) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If you continue to make unsubstantiated edits to the already murky [[Conservative Bias]] article, then I will block you. Please follow the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]].--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:44, 1 February 2008 (EST) | If you continue to make unsubstantiated edits to the already murky [[Conservative Bias]] article, then I will block you. Please follow the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]].--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:44, 1 February 2008 (EST) | ||
:It's an encyclopedia before it is a wiki - that's why we occasionally lock pages. You're attempt to use that encyclopedia entry to "even the score" was completely unacceptable. Also, typically on Conservapedia you keep the talk conversations in one place - don't ping-pong convos.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:51, 1 February 2008 (EST) | :It's an encyclopedia before it is a wiki - that's why we occasionally lock pages. You're attempt to use that encyclopedia entry to "even the score" was completely unacceptable. Also, typically on Conservapedia you keep the talk conversations in one place - don't ping-pong convos.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:51, 1 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | ::I humbly apologize then, but I was simply trying to standardize the articles. I noticed that the [[Liberal Bias]] page had far more content than the [[Conservative Bias]] page. If you prefer, we could just take off the "Examples of Liberal Style" part; it's fairly inaccurate, unneeded (mostly just insulting, not actually informative), and seems in itself a grand example of Conservative Bias. | + | ::I humbly apologize then, but I was simply trying to standardize the articles. I noticed that the [[Liberal Bias]] page had far more content than the [[Conservative Bias]] page. If you prefer, we could just take off the "Examples of Liberal Style" part; it's fairly inaccurate, unneeded (mostly just insulting, not actually informative), and seems in itself a grand example of Conservative Bias.{{unsigned|Lexda}} |
| + | :::What you added and what's in Liberal bias are completely different - don't even try to compare them.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:57, 1 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:57, February 1, 2008
Conservative Bias
If you continue to make unsubstantiated edits to the already murky Conservative Bias article, then I will block you. Please follow the Conservapedia:Commandments.--IDuan 15:44, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- It's an encyclopedia before it is a wiki - that's why we occasionally lock pages. You're attempt to use that encyclopedia entry to "even the score" was completely unacceptable. Also, typically on Conservapedia you keep the talk conversations in one place - don't ping-pong convos.--IDuan 15:51, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- I humbly apologize then, but I was simply trying to standardize the articles. I noticed that the Liberal Bias page had far more content than the Conservative Bias page. If you prefer, we could just take off the "Examples of Liberal Style" part; it's fairly inaccurate, unneeded (mostly just insulting, not actually informative), and seems in itself a grand example of Conservative Bias.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lexda (talk)