1,193
edits
Changes
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 02:45, February 4, 2008
, 02:45, February 4, 2008no edit summary
::: "''...that doesn't make a lick of sense''": I wondered if I wasn't clear. I don't believe that there are/were such things as evolutionary paths, so why would it concern me that they are not yet fully understood.
::: "''...that doesn't make a lick of sense''": I wondered if I wasn't clear. I don't believe that there are/were such things as evolutionary paths, so why would it concern me that they are not yet fully understood.
::: Feebasfactor, the claim is that deep down, atheists don't ''really'', fully, believe that there is no God. At least in some cases. See also [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5560/ here]. I didn't actually look at your link to the atheism article, and I'm not necessarily defending how it might be worded. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:41, 3 February 2008 (EST)
::: Feebasfactor, the claim is that deep down, atheists don't ''really'', fully, believe that there is no God. At least in some cases. See also [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5560/ here]. I didn't actually look at your link to the atheism article, and I'm not necessarily defending how it might be worded. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:41, 3 February 2008 (EST)
::::Ah, that makes a bit more sense. Nice to see you'll at least entertain the notion of transitional fossils.
::::Answering the question and then reworking it as new evidence comes about, I presume?
::::They're two entirely different things, trees and life in general. For example, I do not proclaim to know the origin of life-- And that is not what this is about-- but I do proclaim to know the basics of tree growth.
::::Ah. Possibly because fear of the unknown is common in humans of all creeds, races, etc.? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:45, 3 February 2008 (EST)
== Picture ==
== Picture ==