444
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:32, March 15, 2007
, 16:32, March 15, 2007no edit summary
Conservapedia in contrast has an estimated number of zero coauthors of Erdős among its ranks, while there are lot of very average mathematicians. --[[User:Order|Order]] 16 March 2007, 2:00 (AEST)
Conservapedia in contrast has an estimated number of zero coauthors of Erdős among its ranks, while there are lot of very average mathematicians. --[[User:Order|Order]] 16 March 2007, 2:00 (AEST)
'''Question about point 4.'''
I note that point four states: "Wikipedia's entry for the Renaissance denies any credit to Christianity, its primary inspiration."
Dare I point out that the same could be said for the conservapedia article?
--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 12:32, 15 March 2007 (EDT)