Changes

780 bytes added ,  03:51, February 12, 2008
no edit summary
Line 570: Line 570:     
Don't give a misleading picture of the ACLU.  If someone wants to talk about ACLU involvement in free speech, make sure the examples reflect the distribution of cases the ACLU handles, such as many cases pushing obscenity on our society.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:08, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 
Don't give a misleading picture of the ACLU.  If someone wants to talk about ACLU involvement in free speech, make sure the examples reflect the distribution of cases the ACLU handles, such as many cases pushing obscenity on our society.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:08, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:This is just another example of why it seems futile to write factual articles for this encyclopedia.  I replaced a portion of the article that was based on the false assumptions of an opinion column with factual statements that in no way misrepresented the work of the ACLU.  It is a fact that the ACLU defends speech that others support or despise, yet you insist on reverting my entry to another that violates Conservapedia guidelines. <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Guidelines </ref>You want obscene?  What is more obscene than supporting the free speech rights of the KKK?  Care to give me any references that will satisfy your ideal of obscenity so I won't waste my time writing something you personally disagree with?--Jimmy 22:51, 11 February 2008 (EST)
300

edits