Changes

9 bytes removed ,  04:22, February 12, 2008
don't remove other's comments
Line 576: Line 576:     
:: You rant and rave because I pointed out the fallacy in your approach.  The ACLU pushes obscenity cases 5 times as much as religion cases.  Reflect that fact in your postings here and don't mislead readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:02, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 
:: You rant and rave because I pointed out the fallacy in your approach.  The ACLU pushes obscenity cases 5 times as much as religion cases.  Reflect that fact in your postings here and don't mislead readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:02, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 +
That's because more people sue over obscenity rather than religion. Reflect that fact in your posting and don't mislead readers.--[[User:AndySchlafly|AndySchlafly]] 23:10, 11 February 2008 (EST)
    
::: My 'rant and rave' as you call it follows Conservapedia guidelines while your reversions do not.  I do not know of ANY reference that claims the ACLU 'pushes obscenity cases 5 times as much as religion cases'.  Care to provide a reliable source?  If you do I will gladly write what you want.  I suspect that you made up this statistic and will not be able to back it up.--Jimmy 23:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 
::: My 'rant and rave' as you call it follows Conservapedia guidelines while your reversions do not.  I do not know of ANY reference that claims the ACLU 'pushes obscenity cases 5 times as much as religion cases'.  Care to provide a reliable source?  If you do I will gladly write what you want.  I suspect that you made up this statistic and will not be able to back it up.--Jimmy 23:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)
−
  −
::: Jimmy, do a survey of news stories and decisions mentioning the ACLU.  That fact that you're unaware of it simply illustrates the problem.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:20, 11 February 2008 (EST)
 
3

edits