Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ground Ball"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(re) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I agree. These pages were only created in the first place to rack up points for one of the contests, so i don't think anyone would object to a merge. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 19:22, 13 February 2008 (EST) | I agree. These pages were only created in the first place to rack up points for one of the contests, so i don't think anyone would object to a merge. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 19:22, 13 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :I also agree (as much as I hate to admit it given that I had to go through all these pages & make a template out of them). While some terms I think can stay as seperate pages (like [[Pitcher]]) - many should just be combined into one page.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 19:33, 13 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:33, February 14, 2008
Can I suggest combining all the terms onto a single page? Extremely short glossary-type entries like this and other entries in the template below don't really merit their own article.--Recorder 19:12, 13 February 2008 (EST)
- A baseball glossary? That's a good idea. DanH 19:19, 13 February 2008 (EST)
I agree. These pages were only created in the first place to rack up points for one of the contests, so i don't think anyone would object to a merge. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk Vote in my NEW polls 19:22, 13 February 2008 (EST)