Difference between revisions of "Counterexamples to Evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cell growth)
m (Added more.)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably "grown" from the scales of dinosaurs
 
* The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably "grown" from the scales of dinosaurs
 
* Life supposedly began as single cells and formed multicellular organisms, but if this were true then single cells would have to contain multiple cells, proving easy contradiction. ''NB: No modern cells have evolved into multicellular organisms''
 
* Life supposedly began as single cells and formed multicellular organisms, but if this were true then single cells would have to contain multiple cells, proving easy contradiction. ''NB: No modern cells have evolved into multicellular organisms''
 +
* Life supposedly originated in the "primeval soup" yet no life appears in modern soup.
 +
* Unicorns are clearly superior to horses, yot no unicorns exist today.
 
(add more)
 
(add more)
  

Revision as of 07:03, February 15, 2008

The theory of evolution cannot permit any "counterexamples," or examples of things that could not have evolved. As in logic, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule.

Here are some counterexamples to evolution:

  • beautiful autumn foliage, which lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation
  • the whale, which has no plausible ancestor (Charles Darwin suggested black bears)
  • the eye, which lacks a plausible pathway for incremental evolution
  • bloodclotting, which also lacks a plausible pathway for incremental evolution
  • Jellyfish in Hawaii, which swarm to the beaches precisely 9 to 10 days after each full moon[1]
  • cicada that appear like clockwork every 13 years for some species, and every 17 years for others[2]
  • migratory powers of butterflies and birds[3]
  • The neck of the giraffe.
  • The enormous gaps in the fossil record.
  • The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably "grown" from the scales of dinosaurs
  • Life supposedly began as single cells and formed multicellular organisms, but if this were true then single cells would have to contain multiple cells, proving easy contradiction. NB: No modern cells have evolved into multicellular organisms
  • Life supposedly originated in the "primeval soup" yet no life appears in modern soup.
  • Unicorns are clearly superior to horses, yot no unicorns exist today.

(add more)

References