Difference between revisions of "Talk:Subway"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Tyne and Wear Metro?) |
Sawneybeane (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Tyne and Wear Metro? == | == Tyne and Wear Metro? == | ||
How does the Tyne and Wear Metro count as a subway? Isn't it basically a surface system? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:59, 16 February 2008 (EST) | How does the Tyne and Wear Metro count as a subway? Isn't it basically a surface system? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:59, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | : It has undergound sections (newly tunnelled in the 70s/80s) on two lines in the centres of Newcastle & Gateshead, with 7 stations underground in total. OK, most of the system is above ground (but then so is a majority of the London Underground mileage, if memory serves; I could be wrong - but there is a lot above ground). Don't take our subway status away from us! [[User:Sawneybeane|Sawneybeane]] 08:06, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:06, February 16, 2008
Tyne and Wear Metro?
How does the Tyne and Wear Metro count as a subway? Isn't it basically a surface system? Philip J. Rayment 07:59, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- It has undergound sections (newly tunnelled in the 70s/80s) on two lines in the centres of Newcastle & Gateshead, with 7 stations underground in total. OK, most of the system is above ground (but then so is a majority of the London Underground mileage, if memory serves; I could be wrong - but there is a lot above ground). Don't take our subway status away from us! Sawneybeane 08:06, 16 February 2008 (EST)