Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fundamentalism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (removed line break)
(History of articles.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== This article ==
 +
 
I created this article as a stub, because it was in the wanted page list.  However, I wonder, do we have an article describing the beliefs of modern evangelical Christians?  I would think such an article should be a centerpiece.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 11:52, 6 January 2008 (EST)
 
I created this article as a stub, because it was in the wanted page list.  However, I wonder, do we have an article describing the beliefs of modern evangelical Christians?  I would think such an article should be a centerpiece.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 11:52, 6 January 2008 (EST)
  
Line 8: Line 10:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
And now I know what Fundamentalism is.. that would earn another 2 points on the American Gov't final. -^_^- [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 21:48, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 
And now I know what Fundamentalism is.. that would earn another 2 points on the American Gov't final. -^_^- [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 21:48, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 +
----
 +
Okay, a bit of history of this and a related article.
 +
 +
* An article named '''Fundamentalism''' was created on 15th March, 2007.
 +
* An article named '''Fundamentalist''' was created on 25th March, 2007.
 +
* On 28th September, 2007, merge tags were put on both articles, suggesting that Fundamentalis'''t''' be merged into Fundamentalis'''m'''.
 +
* On 6th January 2008, the content of Fundamentalis'''m''' was pasted into Fundamentalis'''t''', and Fundamentalis'''m''' was deleted to "make way for move".  Presumably the intention was that the now-merged Fundamentalis'''t''' article would be moved to Fundamentalis'''m'''.  However, this did not happen, and on 7th January (about 12 hours after the deletion), a new version of Fundamentalis'''m''' was created.
 +
 +
The 6th January paste was just that: a simple copy-and-paste job, with no attempt to actually merge.  I'm going to do the same thing in a moment, copying and pasting the content of Fundamentalis'''t''' into this article (Fundamentalis'''m''').  I might then attempt a rough merge, but I will make Fundamentalis'''t''' a redirect to this article.  I will also restore the history of this article.
 +
 +
I hope that's all clear.  It took a bit for me just to figure all that out!
 +
 +
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:37, 17 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 12:37, February 17, 2008

This article

I created this article as a stub, because it was in the wanted page list. However, I wonder, do we have an article describing the beliefs of modern evangelical Christians? I would think such an article should be a centerpiece.-MexMax 11:52, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Superb entry, MexMax!!!! I learned from your work. Yes, we should have an entry on evangelical Christians. I'll look first, and then start one if not already here somewhere.--Aschlafly 12:04, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Not to complain, but why was my edit reverted? I was simply making the article more informative. CodyH 2238 7 January 2008 (BST)
I misjudged it, sorry. I reverted it back to your edit. DanH 15:14, 7 January 2008 (EST)


And now I know what Fundamentalism is.. that would earn another 2 points on the American Gov't final. -^_^- Fuzzy 21:48, 21 January 2008 (EST)


Okay, a bit of history of this and a related article.

  • An article named Fundamentalism was created on 15th March, 2007.
  • An article named Fundamentalist was created on 25th March, 2007.
  • On 28th September, 2007, merge tags were put on both articles, suggesting that Fundamentalist be merged into Fundamentalism.
  • On 6th January 2008, the content of Fundamentalism was pasted into Fundamentalist, and Fundamentalism was deleted to "make way for move". Presumably the intention was that the now-merged Fundamentalist article would be moved to Fundamentalism. However, this did not happen, and on 7th January (about 12 hours after the deletion), a new version of Fundamentalism was created.

The 6th January paste was just that: a simple copy-and-paste job, with no attempt to actually merge. I'm going to do the same thing in a moment, copying and pasting the content of Fundamentalist into this article (Fundamentalism). I might then attempt a rough merge, but I will make Fundamentalist a redirect to this article. I will also restore the history of this article.

I hope that's all clear. It took a bit for me just to figure all that out!

Philip J. Rayment 07:37, 17 February 2008 (EST)