5
edits
Changes
→Content?
::::I understand, and I hope someone who is impassioned does stop by. I heard about this site on Wikipedia, and I think it is an interesting idea. Ultimately, however, I disagree with its intent, and do not think my contributions would be consistent with what is desired here (a conservative Christian viewpoint). I would not feel comfortable contributing, so the most help I feel I can give is by pointing out weaknesses. I don't know how many users there are here, though, so I am sure now that it has been pointed out the matter will be remedied soon enough. Bon chance.--[[User:Gigg|Gigg]] 23:15, 21 February 2008 (EST)
::::I understand, and I hope someone who is impassioned does stop by. I heard about this site on Wikipedia, and I think it is an interesting idea. Ultimately, however, I disagree with its intent, and do not think my contributions would be consistent with what is desired here (a conservative Christian viewpoint). I would not feel comfortable contributing, so the most help I feel I can give is by pointing out weaknesses. I don't know how many users there are here, though, so I am sure now that it has been pointed out the matter will be remedied soon enough. Bon chance.--[[User:Gigg|Gigg]] 23:15, 21 February 2008 (EST)
:::::It's hard to make "literature" controversial :-). You're welcome to give it a try, but I understand your reluctance, while I don't think it's necessary. May the Wikibug bite you in the end... :-)-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 23:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)
:::::It's hard to make "literature" controversial :-). You're welcome to give it a try, but I understand your reluctance, while I don't think it's necessary. May the Wikibug bite you in the end... :-)-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 23:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)
::::::I wouldn't have thought it was possible to politicize [[deconstruction]] either, but apparently it can be done. You seem good-natured, so I wish you well.--[[User:Gigg|Gigg]] 23:25, 21 February 2008 (EST)