Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by KambeiShimada (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* Let's talk about something else!
 
* Let's talk about something else!
 
* I'm not interested in that!
 
* I'm not interested in that!
−
 
+
* My name is Andy: even though I know I'm wrong, I still think you're using liberal deceit!  Goodbye!
 +
* My name is Karajou!  I'm going to report you to the FBI, and close my ears to what you're saying, even though I know you're right, deep down, and sing la la la la ala la la. 
 +
* My name is TerryH ~ even though your claim is perfect logically, the Bible says it's wrong, so YOU must be wrong!  Oops, I blocked you.
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  

Revision as of 01:51, February 25, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:

  • I'm not aware of that! (without admitting a failure to look)
  • Let's talk about something else!
  • I'm not interested in that!
  • My name is Andy: even though I know I'm wrong, I still think you're using liberal deceit! Goodbye!
  • My name is Karajou! I'm going to report you to the FBI, and close my ears to what you're saying, even though I know you're right, deep down, and sing la la la la ala la la.
  • My name is TerryH ~ even though your claim is perfect logically, the Bible says it's wrong, so YOU must be wrong! Oops, I blocked you.

References

  1. ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [1].