Difference between revisions of "Talk:Runaway greenhouse effect"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I say merge it and make it a subcategory within [[Greenhouse gas]]. [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 17:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I say merge it and make it a subcategory within [[Greenhouse gas]]. [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 17:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
"a runaway greenhouse effect has been predicted by some climate scientists" -- Which scientists, exactly, are predicting a runaway greenhouse effect on Earth?  This part would really do with some references to back it up.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 00:30, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 05:30, March 2, 2008

Wow, yet another bizarre article that asserts nothing more than that its topic does not exist! Human 18:59, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

I say merge it and make it a subcategory within Greenhouse gas. DrSandstone 17:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

"a runaway greenhouse effect has been predicted by some climate scientists" -- Which scientists, exactly, are predicting a runaway greenhouse effect on Earth? This part would really do with some references to back it up.--Frey 00:30, 2 March 2008 (EST)