Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gregor Mendel"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article!)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article!
 
The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article!
 +
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 05:33, March 3, 2008

The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--Snotbowst 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)