Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gregor Mendel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(unsigned and reply) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! | + | The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! {{unsigned|Mcpannier}} |
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST) | How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | : Because nobody has added it yet? Here's your chance! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:37, March 3, 2008
The man was a botanical genious, you need a more scientific approach to the article! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcpannier (talk)
How come there is no mention of his founding of modern genetics with his 3:1 ratio and factors (allele)?--Snotbowst 00:33, 3 March 2008 (EST)
- Because nobody has added it yet? Here's your chance! Philip J. Rayment 00:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)