Difference between revisions of "Embraced deceit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Embraced deceit can be summed up in one word: history) |
(Undo revision 402449 by Special:Contributions/DLerner (User talk:DLerner); misleading edit summary so I assume it way subVersive in some way.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also. | '''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also. | ||
| − | '''Embraced deceit''' is common. | + | '''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].<ref>See a list of examples at [[deceit]].</ref> |
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 19:05, March 10, 2008
Embraced deceit is deceit that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the deceit promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
Embraced deceit is common among liberals, but non-existent among conservatives.[1]