Difference between revisions of "Talk:Air temperature and carbon dioxide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DrSandstone (talk | contribs) (New page: I really don't want to be too nit-picky, and I certainly don't want to cause offense to the author of this article, but it seems a little too specific for it's own page, especially conside...) |
(Are you interested in the science of this topic? If so, please help!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I really don't want to be too nit-picky, and I certainly don't want to cause offense to the author of this article, but it seems a little too specific for it's own page, especially considering how short it is. I realize more could probably be added in the future, but really how much can be said about this particular subject? I would suggest it be included in an existing page, possible the [[Global warming]] page? -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 14:19, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | I really don't want to be too nit-picky, and I certainly don't want to cause offense to the author of this article, but it seems a little too specific for it's own page, especially considering how short it is. I realize more could probably be added in the future, but really how much can be said about this particular subject? I would suggest it be included in an existing page, possible the [[Global warming]] page? -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 14:19, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This is about the correlation between the two, which Al Gore used to say indicated causation. Indeed, he used it to support the [[AGW hypothesis]]. It certainly deserves a page of its own and should not be hidden within a long, contentious article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Wikipedia glosses over the fact that CO2 is driven by air temp - and not the other way around - in its mania to support the secular religion of global warming and the "salvation" of the [[Kyoto Protocol]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Please help my be writing everything you know about the correlation between temperature and CO2, particularly if it sheds any light on one causing changes in the other. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:24, March 11, 2008
I really don't want to be too nit-picky, and I certainly don't want to cause offense to the author of this article, but it seems a little too specific for it's own page, especially considering how short it is. I realize more could probably be added in the future, but really how much can be said about this particular subject? I would suggest it be included in an existing page, possible the Global warming page? -DrSandstone 14:19, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
- This is about the correlation between the two, which Al Gore used to say indicated causation. Indeed, he used it to support the AGW hypothesis. It certainly deserves a page of its own and should not be hidden within a long, contentious article.
- Wikipedia glosses over the fact that CO2 is driven by air temp - and not the other way around - in its mania to support the secular religion of global warming and the "salvation" of the Kyoto Protocol.