Difference between revisions of "Talk:Socialism and global warming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DrSandstone (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry, but this is just rubbish, or at best just an opinion. The dividing line between enclyclopedia and <s>rant</s> opinion piece has now been crossed! And how many more "articles" on [[global warming]] do we need? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 15:07, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | Sorry, but this is just rubbish, or at best just an opinion. The dividing line between enclyclopedia and <s>rant</s> opinion piece has now been crossed! And how many more "articles" on [[global warming]] do we need? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 15:07, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Yes, this article has me pretty puzzled. I'm actually a little concerned that Ed Poor's account has been possibly hacked by a parodist. Is there any way for a sysop to look into this? It's not even up to Ed's usual typesetting. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 15:12, 11 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:12, March 11, 2008
Sorry, but this is just rubbish, or at best just an opinion. The dividing line between enclyclopedia and rant opinion piece has now been crossed! And how many more "articles" on global warming do we need? Humblpi 15:07, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, this article has me pretty puzzled. I'm actually a little concerned that Ed Poor's account has been possibly hacked by a parodist. Is there any way for a sysop to look into this? It's not even up to Ed's usual typesetting. -DrSandstone 15:12, 11 March 2008 (EDT)