Difference between revisions of "Talk:Koran"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Koran moved to Talk:Qur'an: more proper transliteration)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The large portion I removed is identical to the first section on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an&oldid=115617266 Wikipedia page] on the date this page was created.  Browsing the Wikipedia edit history shows that the information was the work of various editors, none of whom appear to be Stevendavy. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 12:44, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
 
The large portion I removed is identical to the first section on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qur%27an&oldid=115617266 Wikipedia page] on the date this page was created.  Browsing the Wikipedia edit history shows that the information was the work of various editors, none of whom appear to be Stevendavy. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 12:44, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Why on earth would you describe the ''Qu'ran'' in the terms presented by the ''Catholic Encylopedia''???  That's just shameful.

Revision as of 19:25, March 15, 2008

is there seriously no discussion on this? previous unsigned comment added by User:Casenj 15:11, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

The large portion I removed is identical to the first section on the Wikipedia page on the date this page was created. Browsing the Wikipedia edit history shows that the information was the work of various editors, none of whom appear to be Stevendavy. Jinkas 12:44, 18 July 2007 (EDT)


Why on earth would you describe the Qu'ran in the terms presented by the Catholic Encylopedia??? That's just shameful.