Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sexual ethics"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
:::Ouch, you have quite a bite :). [[User:DLerner|DLerner]]
 
:::Ouch, you have quite a bite :). [[User:DLerner|DLerner]]
 
::::Th... thanks? :P [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:32, 31 January 2008 (EST)
 
::::Th... thanks? :P [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:32, 31 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
Why is this page locked?  And why is the only comment Bible-related?  Either erase it and lock it or put something more on it.  [The kids find out about it sometime, whether your encyclopedia wants them to or not...] [[User:FlightlessOstrich|FlightlessOstrich]] 16:50, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:50, March 15, 2008

That's it?

You would think that a topic as complex as this would merit a bit more then a quote from Bill Bennett

DLerner

I dunno, he is quite studly. Barikada 23:18, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Yeah, but doesn't this perpetuate the slander that conservatives are afraid of sex? :) DLerner
Well, I dunno. You could argue that it's not family friendly... Because sex doesn't create families. Barikada 23:22, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Ouch, you have quite a bite :). DLerner
Th... thanks? :P Barikada 23:32, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Why is this page locked? And why is the only comment Bible-related? Either erase it and lock it or put something more on it. [The kids find out about it sometime, whether your encyclopedia wants them to or not...] FlightlessOstrich 16:50, 15 March 2008 (EDT)