Difference between revisions of "User talk:McCain08"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This place is '''''NOT''''' a 'hate site aimed at Liberals and Gays.'[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:HelpJazz#I_can_never_get_my_head_around_it] There are plenty of Liberal users on the site. If you are only here to smear this site, then leave...there are plenty of people who want to be on this site. We are not in desperate need of ''sarcastic''[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:McCain08] editors. [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:43, 17 March 2008 (EDT) | This place is '''''NOT''''' a 'hate site aimed at Liberals and Gays.'[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:HelpJazz#I_can_never_get_my_head_around_it] There are plenty of Liberal users on the site. If you are only here to smear this site, then leave...there are plenty of people who want to be on this site. We are not in desperate need of ''sarcastic''[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:McCain08] editors. [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:43, 17 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | Do you read the 'Liberal ______' articles? I've never seen anything like it in my life. It seems that run of the mill articles like 'Soap' will never get searched on conservapedia. People will always go to wikipedia for that. What conservapedia does to get attention is make ridiculous unsourced statements in an article and somehow piece a concurrent line of thought throughout. I've even seen articles that just consist of a quote. Its remarkable! [[User:McCain08|McCain08]] 13:46, 17 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:46, March 17, 2008
This place is NOT a 'hate site aimed at Liberals and Gays.'[1] There are plenty of Liberal users on the site. If you are only here to smear this site, then leave...there are plenty of people who want to be on this site. We are not in desperate need of sarcastic[2] editors. ~BCSTalk2ME 13:43, 17 March 2008 (EDT) Do you read the 'Liberal ______' articles? I've never seen anything like it in my life. It seems that run of the mill articles like 'Soap' will never get searched on conservapedia. People will always go to wikipedia for that. What conservapedia does to get attention is make ridiculous unsourced statements in an article and somehow piece a concurrent line of thought throughout. I've even seen articles that just consist of a quote. Its remarkable! McCain08 13:46, 17 March 2008 (EDT)