Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Liberal code words"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(let's be rational about this) |
(Have a list?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. [[Rationalism]] seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | :You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. [[Rationalism]] seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Have a list? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:13, March 18, 2008
And this is another example of the 'Liberal _____' articles. This one entirely inspired by a comment I left on HelpJazz's page. You don't do your website any favours by producing ridiculous articles like this all the time. Wearethefuture 11:24, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. Rationalism seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --Ed Poor Talk 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Have a list?
You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? ד.לערנער 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)