Difference between revisions of "Debate:Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I doubt it, such a deed would be utterly anti-Christian and dishonest. ~~~~) |
(my 2 cents) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I doubt it, such a deed would be utterly anti-Christian and dishonest. [[User:Angband|Angband]] 08:22, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | I doubt it, such a deed would be utterly anti-Christian and dishonest. [[User:Angband|Angband]] 08:22, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I unblocked several dozen article which had a shortage of "opposing views". There is nothing wrong with a page having a balance of conservative and liberal views on matters of opinion, such as whether the [[minimum wage]] actually benefits inner city blacks. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:31, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:31, March 24, 2008
I doubt it, such a deed would be utterly anti-Christian and dishonest. Angband 08:22, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
- I unblocked several dozen article which had a shortage of "opposing views". There is nothing wrong with a page having a balance of conservative and liberal views on matters of opinion, such as whether the minimum wage actually benefits inner city blacks. --Ed Poor Talk 08:31, 24 March 2008 (EDT)