Difference between revisions of "Talk:Law of biogenesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Picture is in the wrong article) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
...is completely different from the biogenesis discussed in this article. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 22:58, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | ...is completely different from the biogenesis discussed in this article. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 22:58, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Could you add more info about it, why is it different? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 00:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:50, March 28, 2008
Revert
I'm sure the Hindus believe that life arose from non-living matter as opposed to another deity, Karajou. Barikada 23:43, 6 March 2008 (EST)
- Should I not recieve any sort of response within the next ten minutes, Karajou, I'll reinstate my edit. Barikada 23:55, 6 March 2008 (EST)
- The line in question has to do with creationists, the people who believe in the God of the Bible. What you added was a bit sarcastic. Karajou 00:04, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- There are non-Christian creationists, Karajou, and the line does not specifically address the Christian variety. On another note, my entry was in no way sarcastic. Barikada 00:06, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- If you please, take it up with Aschlafly. Karajou 00:09, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- Why should I trouble Andy with this matter, when it is entirely between you and I? Barikada 00:11, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- It's simple...you may not respect me, as you stated on your talk page, but you will respect this website and our conservative/Judeo-Christian beliefs. Karajou 00:12, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- How is accounting for the beliefs of others disrespectful to your Judeo-Christian beliefs, let alone your conservative beliefs or this website? Barikada 00:13, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I think that the problem in some ways is that most of the debate is between evolutionists and Christian creationists. And most of the little bit beyond Christians is with Jews and Muslims, both of which are "related" monotheistic religions. Barikada is technically correct in that atheists would reject life being created by any "god", but to my mind the question is how relevant those other "gods" are, given what I've just said about the debate. That is, I fully accept that atheists would not accept a Hindu creation account (at least if it does propose a creation, but I have my doubts about that anyway), but how many atheists do you see actually debating this with Hindus (or vice versa)? It's really a non-issue there. And the altered wording was a little awkward to make that irrelevant point. However, I've altered it in a different way that is more encompassing, without the awkwardness. All happy? Philip J. Rayment 08:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- Thank you, Philip. ALthough I disagree that the wording was awkward or irrelevant. Barikada 00:33, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- I think that the problem in some ways is that most of the debate is between evolutionists and Christian creationists. And most of the little bit beyond Christians is with Jews and Muslims, both of which are "related" monotheistic religions. Barikada is technically correct in that atheists would reject life being created by any "god", but to my mind the question is how relevant those other "gods" are, given what I've just said about the debate. That is, I fully accept that atheists would not accept a Hindu creation account (at least if it does propose a creation, but I have my doubts about that anyway), but how many atheists do you see actually debating this with Hindus (or vice versa)? It's really a non-issue there. And the altered wording was a little awkward to make that irrelevant point. However, I've altered it in a different way that is more encompassing, without the awkwardness. All happy? Philip J. Rayment 08:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- How is accounting for the beliefs of others disrespectful to your Judeo-Christian beliefs, let alone your conservative beliefs or this website? Barikada 00:13, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- It's simple...you may not respect me, as you stated on your talk page, but you will respect this website and our conservative/Judeo-Christian beliefs. Karajou 00:12, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- Why should I trouble Andy with this matter, when it is entirely between you and I? Barikada 00:11, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- If you please, take it up with Aschlafly. Karajou 00:09, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- There are non-Christian creationists, Karajou, and the line does not specifically address the Christian variety. On another note, my entry was in no way sarcastic. Barikada 00:06, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- The line in question has to do with creationists, the people who believe in the God of the Bible. What you added was a bit sarcastic. Karajou 00:04, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Ribosome Biogenesis...
...is completely different from the biogenesis discussed in this article. TheGySom 22:58, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
- Could you add more info about it, why is it different? --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 00:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)