Siteadmin, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, Administrators
2,155
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
:Completely agree with this proposal. Bold and extremely sensible! Go for it! Apart from reducing the proliferation of trivial articles, it would also be helpful to anyone interested in finding all the information on the Inheritance Cycle, who would be much better served by having it all in one place. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 05:43, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
:Completely agree with this proposal. Bold and extremely sensible! Go for it! Apart from reducing the proliferation of trivial articles, it would also be helpful to anyone interested in finding all the information on the Inheritance Cycle, who would be much better served by having it all in one place. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 05:43, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
::I am completely against it! When we tried that idea with the Lord of the Rings article, it ended up being so huge it was unmanageable. I plan on expanding most of the articles over the summer and think you have a bad idea. WK literally has article for every book under the sun - that is why it has thousands of articles. I appreciate your ideas, but would prefer that you continue to edit the article in Category:Inheritance Cycle. Thanks, [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 08:05, 28 March 2008 (EDT)