Difference between revisions of "Talk:Voter fraud"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not sure why you changed my edits. Isn't there a lot of evidence about the democrats carrying out voter fraud? --[[User:Raytrotter|Raytrotter]] 12:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | Not sure why you changed my edits. Isn't there a lot of evidence about the democrats carrying out voter fraud? --[[User:Raytrotter|Raytrotter]] 12:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Do you have references to back up such a claim? And what about Republican voter fraud? [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 12:50, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | :Do you have references to back up such a claim? And what about Republican voter fraud? [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 12:50, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Then cite it, and cite it extensively. If there's "a lot of evidence" then it shouldn't be hard. The wording is also deeply biased--it's not like Republicans are innocent on the matter. International voter fraud would also be useful. --[[User:John|John]] 12:51, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:51, March 16, 2007
Not sure why you changed my edits. Isn't there a lot of evidence about the democrats carrying out voter fraud? --Raytrotter 12:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- Do you have references to back up such a claim? And what about Republican voter fraud? ColinR 12:50, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- Then cite it, and cite it extensively. If there's "a lot of evidence" then it shouldn't be hard. The wording is also deeply biased--it's not like Republicans are innocent on the matter. International voter fraud would also be useful. --John 12:51, 16 March 2007 (EDT)