Difference between revisions of "Talk:Birth control pill"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (I can still talk.. right? Even though I chose to quit editing)
(Researching)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
:::And not all of "the pills" are diethylstilbestrol, right? [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 23:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::And not all of "the pills" are diethylstilbestrol, right? [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 23:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2434694.ece This] study rejects any link of the pills to an increase in cancer, but supports a link to a decrease in cancer. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 23:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:11, March 29, 2008

Cancer Causing

How? TheGySom 23:06, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

The pill is a carcinogen.--Aschlafly 23:06, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
Could you please elaborate a little, this is an important point which needs to be expanded. TheGySom 23:07, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
According to this the pill increases the risk of some cancers but decreases the risk of others, perhaps this could be clarified. TheGySom 23:09, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
And not all of "the pills" are diethylstilbestrol, right? Fuzzy|AFD 23:10, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
This study rejects any link of the pills to an increase in cancer, but supports a link to a decrease in cancer. TheGySom 23:11, 28 March 2008 (EDT)