Difference between revisions of "Talk:Out-of-place artifact"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(oops) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Questionable? == | ||
A lot of this seems like just [[George McCready Price]]'s "new catastrophism".... which is largely discredited. Then the rest seems like blogs and amateur historians. Trustworthy? Really?-[[User:DParker|DParker]] 20:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | A lot of this seems like just [[George McCready Price]]'s "new catastrophism".... which is largely discredited. Then the rest seems like blogs and amateur historians. Trustworthy? Really?-[[User:DParker|DParker]] 20:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :First of all, if you have evidence that all or even most of the OOParts that I have catalogued in the article are ''not'' out-of-place according to [[uniformitarianism]], then I invite you to show it, not just post Talk, Talk, Talk. | ||
| + | :And second, [[uniformitarianism]] itself never had anything to recommend it but rhetoric. Catastrophism discredited? How?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 21:01, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:01, April 1, 2008
Questionable?
A lot of this seems like just George McCready Price's "new catastrophism".... which is largely discredited. Then the rest seems like blogs and amateur historians. Trustworthy? Really?-DParker 20:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
- First of all, if you have evidence that all or even most of the OOParts that I have catalogued in the article are not out-of-place according to uniformitarianism, then I invite you to show it, not just post Talk, Talk, Talk.
- And second, uniformitarianism itself never had anything to recommend it but rhetoric. Catastrophism discredited? How?--TerryHTalk 21:01, 31 March 2008 (EDT)