Difference between revisions of "ACLU v. Mercer County"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Undo revision 310838 by Special:Contributions/Anonymousss (User talk:Anonymousss)) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Judge Richard Suhrheinrich decried the [[ACLU]]’s “repeated references to the ‘separation of church and state,’” observing that “this extra-constitutional construct has grown tiresome.” Judge Alice Batchelder joined this decision. | Judge Richard Suhrheinrich decried the [[ACLU]]’s “repeated references to the ‘separation of church and state,’” observing that “this extra-constitutional construct has grown tiresome.” Judge Alice Batchelder joined this decision. | ||
| − | [[Category:United States | + | [[Category:United States Law]] |
[[Category:Establishment Clause]] | [[Category:Establishment Clause]] | ||
Revision as of 10:16, April 7, 2008
The Eighth Circuit ruled in favor of a display of the Ten Commandments in ACLU v. Mercer County (2005) by declaring that the Constitution does not demand “a wall of separation between church and state.”
Judge Richard Suhrheinrich decried the ACLU’s “repeated references to the ‘separation of church and state,’” observing that “this extra-constitutional construct has grown tiresome.” Judge Alice Batchelder joined this decision.